{"id":51,"date":"2011-11-30T03:59:26","date_gmt":"2011-11-30T11:59:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/facingthesing.wpengine.com\/?p=51"},"modified":"2014-05-10T14:51:35","modified_gmt":"2014-05-10T21:51:35","slug":"why-spock-is-not-rational","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/2011\/why-spock-is-not-rational\/","title":{"rendered":"Pre\u010do Spock nie je rozumn\u00fd"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\"\"P\u00e1n Spock<\/a> zo seri\u00e1lu Star Trek<\/em> nie je uk\u00e1\u017ekov\u00fdm pr\u00edkladom logiky a rozumnosti, aj ke\u010f si to mo\u017eno mysl\u00edte. Namiesto toho je to \u201eslamen\u00fd pan\u00e1k\u201c rozumnosti, pou\u017eit\u00fd ako (nespr\u00e1vny) pr\u00edklad toho, \u017ee \u013eudsk\u00e9 em\u00f3cie a nerozumnos\u0165 s\u00fa lep\u0161ie ne\u017e logika.<\/p>\n

Tu je typick\u00e1 sc\u00e9nka:<\/p>\n

\n

McCoy: Nu\u017e, p\u00e1n Spock, [mimozem\u0161\u0165ania] sa n\u00e1s ve\u013emi dlho neb\u00e1li, v\u0161ak?<\/p>\n

Spock: Nanajv\u00fd\u0161 nelogick\u00e1 reakcia. Ke\u010f sme im predviedli, \u017ee na\u0161e zbrane s\u00fa dokonalej\u0161ie, mali ujs\u0165.<\/p>\n

McCoy: Mysl\u00edte t\u00fdm, \u017ee mali by\u0165 vo\u010di n\u00e1m opatrn\u00ed?<\/p>\n

Spock: Samozrejme!<\/p>\n

McCoy: P\u00e1n Spock, opatrnos\u0165 je rozumov\u00fd<\/em> proces. Napadlo v\u00e1m niekedy, \u017ee by mohli zareagova\u0165 emocion\u00e1lne<\/em>, hnevom?<\/p>\n

Spock: Doktor, nem\u00f4\u017eem za to, \u017ee s\u00fa nepredv\u00eddate\u013en\u00ed.<\/p>\n

McCoy: Oni s\u00fa dokonale predv\u00eddate\u013en\u00ed, pre ka\u017ed\u00e9ho, kto m\u00e1 cit! Mali by ste si to prizna\u0165, p\u00e1n Spock: va\u0161a \u00fa\u017easn\u00e1 logika sp\u00f4sobila, \u017ee sa na n\u00e1s vrhli.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Samozrejme, na o\u010dak\u00e1van\u00ed, \u017ee sa nelogick\u00e9 bytosti bud\u00fa spr\u00e1va\u0165 rozumne, nie je ni\u010d rozumn\u00e9. Spock mal hromadu d\u00f4kazov, \u017ee t\u00edto mimozem\u0161\u0165ania s\u00fa emocion\u00e1lni, tak\u017ee predpoveda\u0165, \u017ee sa bud\u00fa spr\u00e1va\u0165 rozumne, bolo vrcholne ne<\/em>rozumn\u00e9!<\/p>\n

Tento pr\u00edklad som si ukradol z predn\u00e1\u0161ky Julie Galef \u201eSlamen\u00fd Vulk\u00e1nec<\/a>\u201c. Jej \u010fal\u0161\u00edm pr\u00edkladom \u201eslamen\u00e9ho pan\u00e1ka rozumnosti\u201c alebo hollywoodskej rozumnosti<\/a> je my\u0161lienka, \u017ee by ste nemali urobi\u0165 \u017eiadne rozhodnutie, dokia\u013e nem\u00e1te v\u0161etky potrebn\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie. T\u00e1 sa tie\u017e vyskytuje v Star Treku<\/em>. Obrovsk\u00e9 vesm\u00edrne am\u00e9by sa objavili ne\u010faleko Enterprise<\/em>, a Kirk \u017eiada Spocka o anal\u00fdzu. Spock odpoved\u00e1: \u201eNem\u00e1m \u017eiadnu anal\u00fdzu, kv\u00f4li nedostatku inform\u00e1ci\u00ed… Po\u010d\u00edta\u010de o tomto fenom\u00e9ne ni\u010d neobsahuj\u00fa. Je to mimo na\u0161ej sk\u00fasenosti, a nov\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie zatia\u013e nie s\u00fa signifikantn\u00e9.\u201c<\/p>\n

Niekedy je rozumn\u00e9 h\u013eada\u0165 nov\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie predt\u00fdm, ne\u017e za\u010dnete kona\u0165, ale niekedy mus\u00edte za\u010da\u0165 kona\u0165 na z\u00e1klade toho, \u010do si mysl\u00edte, \u017ee viete. Mus\u00edte porovna\u0165 n\u00e1klady na z\u00edskavanie \u010fal\u0161\u00edch inform\u00e1ci\u00ed s o\u010dak\u00e1vanou hodnotou tejto inform\u00e1cie. Vezmime si \u010fal\u0161\u00ed pr\u00edklad od Gerda Gigerenzera, o mu\u017eovi zva\u017euj\u00facom, s k\u00fdm sa o\u017eeni\u0165:<\/p>\n

\n

Musel by presk\u00fama\u0165 pravdepodobnosti rozli\u010dn\u00fdch d\u00f4sledkov sob\u00e1\u0161a s ka\u017edou z nich \u2013 \u010di sa s n\u00edm dan\u00e1 \u017eena bude e\u0161te po svadbe rozpr\u00e1va\u0165, \u010di sa bude stara\u0165 o ich deti, \u010doko\u013evek \u010do je pre\u0148ho d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e9 \u2013 a \u00fa\u017eitok z ka\u017edej z t\u00fdchto vec\u00ed… Po mnoh\u00fdch rokoch v\u00fdskumu by pravdepodobne zistil, \u017ee jeho definit\u00edvne vyvolan\u00e1 sa u\u017e d\u00e1vno vydala za in\u00e9ho mu\u017ea, ktor\u00fd nerobil tieto v\u00fdpo\u010dty, ale jednoducho sa do nej zamiloval.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Tak\u00e9to spr\u00e1vanie je nerozumn\u00e9, je to chyba vo v\u00fdpo\u010dte hodnoty inform\u00e1cie<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Juliin tret\u00ed pr\u00edklad hollywoodskej rozumnosti je pom\u00fdlen\u00fd princ\u00edp, \u017ee \u201eby\u0165 rozumn\u00fd znamen\u00e1 nikdy sa nespolieha\u0165 na intu\u00edciu\u201c. Napr\u00edklad v jednej epiz\u00f3de Star Treku<\/em>, Kirk a Spock hraj\u00fa \u0161ach. Ke\u010f d\u00e1 Kirk Spockovi mat, Spock povie: \u201eV\u00e1\u0161 nelogick\u00fd pr\u00edstup k \u0161achu m\u00e1 ob\u010das svoje v\u00fdhody, kapit\u00e1n.\u201c<\/p>\n

Av\u0161ak nie\u010do, \u010do sp\u00f4sobuje, \u017ee vyhr\u00e1te v \u0161achu, nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 nerozumn\u00e9 (z h\u013eadiska vyhr\u00e1vania v \u0161achu). Ak nejak\u00e1 met\u00f3da sp\u00f4sobuje, \u017ee vyhr\u00e1te v \u0161achu, rozumn\u00fd \u010dlovek by pou\u017eil t\u00fato met\u00f3du. Ak v\u00e1m intu\u00edcia d\u00e1va lep\u0161ie v\u00fdsledky ne\u017e pomal\u00e9 rozv\u00e1\u017ene uva\u017eovanie, potom je rozumn\u00e9, \u017ee pou\u017eijete intu\u00edciu. A niekedy je to naozaj tak, napr\u00edklad ak ste si vyvinuli dobr\u00fa \u0161achov\u00fa intu\u00edciu po tis\u00edckach parti\u00ed, a ak hr\u00e1te r\u00fdchlostn\u00fd \u0161ach, ktor\u00fd v\u00e1m nedovol\u00ed premyslie\u0165 si d\u00f4sledky ka\u017ed\u00e9ho mo\u017en\u00e9ho \u0165ahu pomocou rozv\u00e1\u017eneho uva\u017eovania.<\/p>\n

Juliin \u0161tvrt\u00fd princ\u00edp hollywoodskej racionality je: \u201eby\u0165 rozumn\u00fd znamen\u00e1 nema\u0165 em\u00f3cie\u201c.<\/p>\n

Iste\u017ee, em\u00f3cie \u010dasto zni\u010dia na\u0161e pokusy o rozumn\u00e9 myslenie a rozhodovanie. Ke\u010f c\u00edtime \u00fazkos\u0165, prece\u0148ujeme riziko. Ke\u010f sa c\u00edtime zranite\u013en\u00ed, m\u00e1me v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed sklon veri\u0165 pover\u00e1m a kon\u0161pira\u010dn\u00fdm te\u00f3ri\u00e1m. Ale to neznamen\u00e1, \u017ee rozumn\u00fd \u010dlovek by sa mal pok\u00fa\u0161a\u0165 zni\u010di\u0165 v\u0161etky svoje em\u00f3cie. Em\u00f3cie predsa vytv\u00e1raj\u00fa<\/em> mnoh\u00e9 z na\u0161ich cie\u013eov, a niekedy n\u00e1m aj pom\u00e1haj\u00fa ich dosahova\u0165<\/em>. Ak si chcete zabeha\u0165 a sp\u00e1li\u0165 pritom nejak\u00fd tuk, a viete, \u017ee po\u010d\u00favanie vysoko energizuj\u00facej hudby v\u00e1s dostane do stavu emocion\u00e1lneho vzru\u0161enia, kedy m\u00e1te v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed sklon \u00eds\u0165 si zabeha\u0165, potom je rozumn\u00e9 pusti\u0165 si nejak\u00e9 vysoko energizuj\u00facu hudbu.<\/p>\n

Spr\u00e1vne roben\u00e1 rozumnos\u0165 je \u201esystematizovan\u00e9 v\u00ed\u0165azstvo<\/a>\u201c. Epistemick\u00e1 rozumnos\u0165 je o tom, \u017ee m\u00e1te s najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161ou pravdepodobnos\u0165ou pravdiv\u00e9 presved\u010denia, a in\u0161trument\u00e1lna rozumnos\u0165 je o tom, \u017ee rob\u00edte rozhodnutia, ktor\u00e9 maximalizuj\u00fa va\u0161e \u0161ance z\u00edska\u0165 viac toho, \u010do chcete. Tak\u017ee, ako hovor\u00ed Julia:<\/p>\n

\n

Ak si mysl\u00edte, \u017ee sa spr\u00e1vate rozumne, ale st\u00e1le dost\u00e1vate nespr\u00e1vnu odpove\u010f, a st\u00e1le dopadnete hor\u0161ie, ne\u017e by ste mohli, v\u00e1\u0161 z\u00e1ver z toho by nemal by\u0165, \u017ee rozumnos\u0165 je zl\u00e1. Ale, \u017ee v\u00e1m rozumnos\u0165 nejde<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u010coskoro sa vr\u00e1tim k t\u00e9me Singularity, ale chcem venova\u0165 e\u0161te dva \u010dl\u00e1nky rozumnosti. Existuj\u00fa z\u00e1kony myslenia, a potrebujeme sa dohodn\u00fa\u0165, \u010do to je, sk\u00f4r ne\u017e za\u010dneme hovori\u0165 o n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fdch t\u00e9mach ako UI. V opa\u010dnom pr\u00edpade sa zasekneme sa nezhode oh\u013eadom nejakej veci, len aby sme nesk\u00f4r zistili, \u017ee v\u00a0skuto\u010dnosti<\/em> sme sa zasekli preto\u017ee sa nezhodneme na to, ako m\u00f4\u017eeme vedie\u0165<\/em>, ktor\u00e9 veci s\u00fa spr\u00e1vne.<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

P\u00e1n Spock zo seri\u00e1lu Star Trek nie je uk\u00e1\u017ekov\u00fdm pr\u00edkladom logiky a rozumnosti, aj ke\u010f si to mo\u017eno mysl\u00edte. Namiesto toho je to \u201eslamen\u00fd pan\u00e1k\u201c rozumnosti, pou\u017eit\u00fd ako (nespr\u00e1vny) pr\u00edklad toho, \u017ee \u013eudsk\u00e9 em\u00f3cie a nerozumnos\u0165 s\u00fa lep\u0161ie ne\u017e logika.… continue reading<\/a> »<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chapter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/intelligenceexplosion.com\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}